2nd April
The disinfection of water (including wastewater) plays a vital role in providing safe drinking water and decontaminating fluids released from medical facilities and pharmaceutical production plants. The reduction in microbial numbers, and the targeted elimination of pathogens, is combined with the removal of unwanted impurities, including antimicrobials. This is an important consideration as trace amounts of antibiotics in wastewater may increase microbial resistance, leading to the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
For many years, the traditional route has been by chemical disinfectants, primarily the application of oxidants such as free chlorine, peracetic acid, chlorine dioxide, chloramines, ozone and ultraviolet radiation 1. These kill microorganisms through protein and enzyme denaturation and DNA destruction.
Attention is increasingly being paid to electrochemical disinfection and photocatalytic disinfection to minimise pollution and to meet the safety requirements of wastewater reuse. This is a topic that pharmaceutical and healthcare organisations need to be mindful of. These alternative forms of disinfection for water treatment are examined in this article.
The primary problem in water distribution systems concerns the formation of biofilms. The likely formation of biofilms - microbial communities bound to a surface and protected by a slime layer - is dependent upon a range of factors, including the presence and concentration of nutrients, water temperature, pipe material composition, hydrodynamic conditions (principally water flow rates) and levels of disinfectant residual.
The most effective way of treating a biofilm is prevention. However, where biofilm communities form, the application of heat provides the basis for remediation. This said, many water systems cannot be heated and therefore remain reliant on chemical treatment.
Traditionally, chlorine and related compounds, or hydrogen peroxide / peracetic acid, have been used. Electrochemical and photocatalytic methods offer alternatives for water system disinfection.
Electrochemical disinfection is a physical-chemical method by which chemical oxidants are generated in situ via redox reactions on the surface of an electrode 2. This method does not lead to the transport and storage of hazardous materials 3. Furthermore, it introduces economic efficiencies since it can be readily scaled.
Multiple oxidants can be considered for electrochemical disinfection. The process needs to be modified as per the oxidant, electrode type, water composition and system operating voltage. Examples of oxidants include free chlorine, hydroxyl radicals or sulphate radicals. Electrogenerated chlorine is the most common, where breakpoint chlorination is used to assess for how long chlorine needs to be generated (which is until all available ammonia has reacted and free chlorine is detected in the water system) 4.
The effect is seemingly superior to conventional chemical treatment. A recent review found the synergetic impact of radicals and chlorine, together with the contribution of high chlorine concentration at acidic pH near the anode surface, were the main factors enhancing the disinfection performance of in situ electrochlorination, based on a single pass of water through the electrochemical cell 5.
In terms of design, there are several variations. These include electrode cell geometries in the form of separator-divided or undivided cells with immersed electrodes, parallel plate electrodes, 3D-flow-by and flow-through electrodes, rods, and tubular electrodes in monopolar, bipolar, or mixed arrangements. For the killing of microorganisms, the most important consideration is with the inactivation kinetics and the associated quantification of disinfection results. Inactivation kinetics and modelling frameworks are necessary to elucidate the disinfection performance and to help optimise operational disinfection conditions.
There is a trade-off between those systems that operate at higher overpotentials - which consume more energy per dose - and contact times. The more energy exerted, the faster the process. At the same time, the more energy exerted, the greater the cost.
Photocatalytic disinfection is the reaction between a photocatalyst (the initiator of reaction) and an aqueous media (the target of disinfection). Photocatalysis can inactivate microorganisms and degrade organic pollutants contained in wastewater. It can also reduce many inorganic pollutants into harmless substances.
In terms of the mechanism, the adsorption of a photon with sufficient energy by TiO2 promotes electrons to be released. This creates reactive oxygen species. In water, this creates hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl and hydroperoxyl radicals, which cause the loss of membrane respiratory activity within bacterial cells.
The primary mode for killing bacteria is due to membrane and cell wall damage, caused through lipid peroxidation products and the leakage of intercellular components like cations, RNA and protein. The efficacy against Gram-Negative Bacteria (GNB) has been widely reported 6.
The process of photocatalysis has the advantage of being activated by s
olar energy and not producing any toxic by-products. However, optimisation can be complex as water characteristics influence the surface chemistry of the photocatalyst materials. This highlights the need to understand the nature of the water to be treated, the impact of seasonality and the types of chemicals present. Photocatalytic disinfection is also dependent on different operational parameters like photocatalysts dosage, pH, light source and temperature.
In a related application, TiO2-coated filters have been tested out for the disinfection of air with some success, causing oxidation of bacteria suspended on microbial carrying particles 7. Other catalytic processes that have the potential to decontaminate water include electrocatalysis and ozone catalysis.
As with most areas of life, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is presenting opportunities to improve processes. For example, in China, researchers at the Shanghai Institute of Pollution Control and Ecological Security have used AI (fuzzy logic-based neuro systems) to assess complex variations and to accurately adjust outputs for wastewater disinfection 8. This extends to ensuring public safety by applying AI to control disinfection by-products and residues (and to meet water discharge standards).
The treatment of wastewater, especially from hospitals and pharmaceutical plants, is very important, both as part of a process to reduce pollutants but also for the control of pathogens.
Attention must also be paid to microbial reduction when making water suitable for drinking. Environmental concerns are directing treatment processes away from high volumes of chemicals to alternative measures. This article has considered electrochemical and photocatalytic alternatives.
1. Shang, C.; Blatchley, E. R. Chlorination of Pure Bacterial Cultures in Aqueous Solution. Water Res. 2001, 35 (1), 244– 254
2. Cano, A.; Cañizares, P.; Barrera-Díaz, C.; et al. Use of Conductive-Diamond Electrochemical-Oxidation for the Disinfection of Several Actual Treated Wastewaters. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 211–212, 463– 469
3. Yeung, M., Tian, T., Liu, L. et al. Impacts of electrochemical disinfection on the viability and structure of the microbiome in secondary effluent water. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering 2024, 18 (5)
4. Lacasa, E.; Llanos, J.; Cañizares, P.; Rodrigo, M. A. Electrochemical Denitrificacion with Chlorides Using DSA and BDD Anodes. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 184, 66– 71
5. Atrashkevich, A., Alum, A., Stirling, R. et al. Approaching easy water disinfection for all: Can in situ electrochlorination outperform conventional chlorination under realistic conditions?, Water Research,4; 250: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2023.121014
6. Robertson JMC, Robertson PKJ, Lawton LA. A comparison of the effectiveness of TiO2 photocatalysis and UVA photolysis for the destruction of three pathogenic micro-organisms. J Photochem Photobiol A. 2005;175(1):51–56
7. Lin CY, Li CS. Effectiveness of titanium dioxide photocatalyst filters for controlling bioaerosols. Aerosol Sci Technol. 2003;37(2):162–170
8. Ding, Y., Sun, Q., Lin, Y. et al. Application of artificial intelligence in (waste)water disinfection: Emphasizing the regulation of disinfection by-products formation and residues prediction, Water Research, 2024; 253: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.121267